Snap’s IPO: A tech spectacle [datagraphic]

From PitchBook (by Mikey Tom)

In what’s likely the most highly anticipated IPO since Facebook, Snap is poised to take the plunge into the public markets in the coming days. The company just priced its offering and will raise $3.4 billion via selling 200 million shares at a price of $17 each, above the announced range of $14-$16.

We’ve combed through the filing to pull out some of the more interesting tidbits for our latest datagraphic. Check it out below to see a breakdown of Snap’s financing and valuation history, board of directors, ownership percentages and more.

pitchbook-snap-ipo-datagraphic

How does Snap compare to pre-IPO Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn?

From PitchBook (by Mikey Tom)

Snap’s public IPO filing gave everyone a peek into the inner workings of the secretive company. Finally, Snap’s user metrics and financial information, as well as some interesting tidbits regarding voting rights, were revealed.

But how does Snap compare to other social giants that previously took the dive into the public markets? For starters, here’s a juxtaposition of offering size:

  • Snap: $3 billion (estimated)
  • Twitter: $1.82 billion
  • Facebook: $16 billion
  • LinkedIn: $352.8 million

We’ve laid out some other key details for Snap, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn for a side-by-side comparison on how these figurehead companies looked heading into their IPOs:

snap_fb_twitter_linkedin_comparison_final_tra

An inside look at Snap’s IPO filing

In a moment that many in the tech industry have been waiting for, Snap finally filed its public IPO papers Thursday, revealing a host of information about the notoriously secretive company. We dug through the filing and pulled out some of the more interesting tidbits, including revenue numbers and user growth numbers, as well as some surprising factoids, like unique information around voting shares.

Let’s jump in:

The basics

The Los Angeles area company will be listing shares on the NYSE under the symbol SNAP, confirming rumors that broke early this week. The target amount for the offering is $3 billion, which is about 66% larger than the $1.8 billion it raised in its last private financing in May 2016.

Voting rights

In a surprising move that some caught wind of early, the Class A shares that will be issued via this IPO will not come with any voting rights—the company’s other two classes of shares, Class C and B, command 10 votes per share and one vote per share, respectively. While there are many companies that have non-voting shares, Snap claims its IPO will be the first to issue all non-voting shares on a US stock exchange.

Also disclosed in the doc is that the two co-founders, Evan Spiegel and Robert Murphy, control a substantial portion of the Class C stock, so much in fact that they potentially have the power to control any and all matters submitted for stockholder approval.

Although it’s not terribly uncommon for founders to format voting rights in such a way that they maintain control post-IPO (Mark Zuckerberg to this day can, for the most part, still do as he pleases), it’s extremely uncommon for companies to issue shares that hold no voting rights. It’s also revealed that if either co-founder is fired from the company, he would maintain his voting power.

Company metrics

Snap boasts 158 million daily active users that open its app an average of 18 times per day, spending an average of 25 to 30 minutes in total engaging with the app. Of those DAUs, 60% create Snaps with the camera every day, 60% use its chat service each day and 25% post to their “story” each day.

While 158 million DAUs is nothing to shake a stick at, Snap has been experiencing slowing growth in its user base, particularly following the launch of Instagram’s Stories, which may be concerning to some investors. In the last quarter of 2016, Snap added just 5 million new users globally, the smallest QoQ increase in over two years. What’s perhaps even more worrisome is that all the user growth in 4Q 2016 came from the US and Europe, with the company adding a none material number of new users in the rest of the world.

Snap recorded $405.5 million of revenue in 2016, representing a sizeable 590% increase from 2015. Average revenue per user last year sat at $1.05, up 3.4x YoY. That said, net loss is also on an upward trend, increasing from $372.9 million in 2015 to $514.6 million in 2016, 38% uptick.

From the filing: ” We have incurred operating losses in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability.”

Ownership

Snap’s co-founders, Spiegel and Murphy, each own 21.8% of the company. Early investors Benchmark Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners own 12.7% and 8.3%, respectively.

According to the PitchBook Platform, other VC backers include General Catalyst, Institutional Venture Partners, SV Angel, Graph Ventures, Entrée Capital, New Enterprise Associates, GSV Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Some nontraditional investors consist of Coatue Management, Grupo Arcano, GIC, Rizvi Traverse Management, Alibaba, Yahoo, York Capital Management and Fidelity Investments.

Other interesting factoids

• Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs will lead the offering
• Snap had 1,859 employees as of December 31
• 2.5 billion snaps are created per day
• Snap paid $150 million to acquire Looksery and $64.2 million for Bitstrips (it was rumored Snap paid $100 million for Bitstrips)
• Snap has a $2 billion contract with Google Cloud, signed just Monday
• Snap gave its chief strategy officer Imran Khan $145 million in stock awards in 2015, hiring him from Credit Suisse
• Spiegel’s salary will drop from $500,000 to $1 (plus lots of bonuses, etc.) upon completion of its IPO
• Snap wants to ‘significantly broaden the distribution of Spectacles’ in 2017
• The company just recently established the Snap Foundation. After the offering, Snap and its co-founders pledged to donate up to 13,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock to the Snap Foundation over the course of the next 15 to 20 years. They anticipate “the proposed programs of the Snap Foundation will support arts, education, and youth.”

Snap swipes Sony’s CEO ahead of IPO

From PitchBook (by Dana Olsen)

Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton is stepping down from his position as head of the film and television powerhouse to take on a more active role at Snap, the parent company of widely-used app Snapchat.

Lynton was an early investor in Snap and joined the board in June 2013, and became chairman late last year. He’ll stay on at Sony as co-CEO for a six-month wind-down period. The transition comes amid Snap’s move into the public sphere, as the company is widely believed to have filed confidentially for its IPO in November.

“It has been an extraordinary 13 years and an honor to work at Sony with some of the most talented and creative people in the entertainment space,” Lynton in a statement. “I have been involved with Evan (Spiegel) and Snapchat since its early days, and given its growth since then, decided the time was right to transition and focus on my role as Chairman of the Board of Snap Inc.”

In his 13-year tenure at Sony, Lynton may be best known for leading the company through an infamous 2014 cyberattack, when North Korean hackers infiltrated Sony’s email servers and released sensitive information to the public, including email conversations between Lynton and Spiegel.

In his new role, Lynton will reportedly focus on strategy and governance in support of Spiegel. Snap has been in the headlines over the last few months for its upcoming public offering, which could reportedly value the company between $20 billion and $25 billion.

There’s mounting evidence that Snap’s IPO is, in fact, moving forward. Axios reported last week that Snap may file a public regulatory before the end of the month and that the company has hired Solebury Group, an advisory firm known for helping determine IPO allocations. It’s likely the company will issue its public offering by this spring.

But it’s not all good news for Snap. The year opened with some negative PR for the company when an ex-employee sued Snap for allegedly lying about key growth metrics.